On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:33:26 +0200, adisak wrote: >Hi! >I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k >kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ? the "48k" of Uzix48k name is not about kernel size. As Adriano already said, Uzix48k will have a 64Kb kernel. 48k means that all apps will have 48kb of linear address available, instead of the actual 32Kb of Uzix32k. 48Kb is almost what is given by MSXDOS, but the difference is Uzix provide lots and lots of services DOS will never imagine to provide, and of course, the multitask... ((^= Daniel Caetano [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..."A necessidade de criatividade e' o que contribui para a mudanca. A criatividade mantem o criador vivo." (Frank Herbert) -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Manuel Bilderbeek
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Manuel Bilderbeek
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- RE: UZIX is dead adisak
- RE: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Manuel Bilderbeek
- Re: UZIX is dead Daniel Caetano
- Re: UZIX is dead Ivan Latorre
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Eric Boon
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Eric Boon
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Patriek Lesparre
- Re: UZIX is dead Albert Beevendorp
- Re: UZIX is dead David Heremans