On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:57:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I thought my prevous message was clear, but it isn't... > > The message in HTML send by Wynke was empty... the HTML was attached... > and no longer readibly without any extra actions... > You can see in my message that the attachment was called "bla.html"....
I thought my message was clear too. The message itself was empty before I sent it. The file called bla.html had .html as extension but did *not* actually contain any HTML, because mailman converted it from html to plain text. It was always an attachment, from the moment I sent it. The list changed nothing at all except for turning the HTML into plain text - not even change the filename of the attachment. > All mail-clients have options to send plain-text only, bother us with > HTML, RTF of what other format... My mail client has no options that I know of for anything other than plain text. I have not worked with any that I was aware could do RTF. Most clients used by 'common users' (or at least Outlook) can do plain text and HTML. Most of them are set to HTML by default. People could change that, often they do not. Why force them if we ca have the mailinglist convert the mail anyway? As I said, your objections about my mail are unjustified, because no actual mail client will send mails in that manner. Or did Laurens' mail also turn into an empty mail with an attachment? Hugs, Wynke. _______________________________________________ MSX mailing list ([email protected]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx
