As far as being interesting in subtractive dither, I can’t say I’m terribly interested in it, mainly because I prefer a larger word size (24-bit is convenient, it can be smaller, but more than 16), and no dither at all…but I’d be willing to discuss it with you, Sampo ;-)
On Mar 26, 2014, at 10:53 PM, Sampo Syreeni <de...@iki.fi> wrote: > On 2014-03-26, Nigel Redmon wrote: > >> Maybe this would be interesting to some list members? A basic and intuitive >> explanation of audio dither: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWpWIQw7HWU > > Since it's been quiet and dither was mentioned... Is anybody interested in > the development of subtractive dither? I have a broad idea in my mind, and a > little bit of code (for once!) as well. Unfortunately nothing too easily > adaptable though... Willing to copy and explain all of it, though. :) > >> The video will be followed by a second part, in the coming weeks, that >> covers details like when, and when not to use dither and noise shaping. I’ll >> be putting up some additional test files in an article on ear level.com in >> the next day or so. > > In any case, thank you kindly. Dithering and noise shaping, both in theory > and in practice is *still* something far too few people grasp for real. > -- > Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - de...@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front > +358-40-3255353, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2-- -- dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp links http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
