Should standardize the sampling rate as well. With an infinite sampling rate and your method, you'd have something like a pure broadband "tone", right?
> On May 7, 2014, at 5:39 PM, Sampo Syreeni <de...@iki.fi> wrote: > > This is going to sound pretty weird, I'm sure, but could as many people > on-list perform the following experiment on themselves and their close ones, > as possible? Then report back (privately, so as not to ruin the surprise for > everybody else?) > > Take a long (at least 30 seconds and possibly more) sequence of truly random > (AWGN) noise, either from a very long period PRNG or from a primary > randomness source. Then starting with very long periods of over 10 seconds, > loop the noise, curtailing the period of repetition. Dropping it, say, 200ms > at a time at first, and in the end perhaps something like 10ms at a time. > When does your ear, perceptually speaking, start to say that the noise > repeats? Precisely? > > I'd be interested in hearing what people on-list have to say about this one. > Especially the ones who are curious enough to find the precise limit in > milliseconds, and even subject their loved ones to the test. > > Because, I mean, at least for me this was a total mindfuck, and if you > analyze it e.g. via the usual LTI theory of human hearing, the results do not > make any sense at all. I think, but I'm not too sure. Whence the question. ;) > -- > Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - de...@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front > +358-40-3255353, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2 > -- > dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: > subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp > links > http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp > http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp -- dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp links http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
