> I think I was slightly off when I said that the units of psd are power per

> unit frequency -- since the whole signal has infinite power,
�
no, i don't think so.
�
> the units�really need to be power per unit frequency per unit time, which

> (confusingly) is the same thing as power.
�
the signal has infinite energy because it goes on (with power greater than some 
positive lower-bound) forever. �but it's not infinite power unless it's 
something like "true" white noise (which has infinite bandwidth).
�what comes out of a random number generator (a good one) is white only up to 
Nyquist. �not infinite-bandwidth white noise.
�
the power of a random process is the mean-square which is the variance plus 
DC^2. �i think the DC component is 0 in the present
case.
�
so the integral, from -Nyquist to +Nyquist of the PSD must equal the variance, 
as derived from the p.d.f. �and that value also has to be the zeroth-lag value 
of the autocorrelation.
�
> This could be another reason why
> some special scaling is needed as compared to a finite-length FFT.
really, the only scaling would be that comparing the Fourier integral (with 
truncated and finite limts) to a Riemann summation (which could be expressed as 
the DFT).





--
�


r b-j � � � � � � � � � r...@audioimagination.com
�


"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
_______________________________________________
dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp

Reply via email to