You stated that it wasn't easily available for tagging. I'm simply pointing out that is in fact not available at all for tagging. Personally, I don't think MB is anywhere near being a music encyclopedia with the current schema and UI issues so I am very focused on tagable data.
Cristov (wolfsong) --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'MusicBrainz style discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [mb-style] LiveTrackStyle Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 15:23:17 +0200 So what? We could agree on a minimal set of information to be added to the track name field in the database. But all this bloated information is too much, imho. The question is: Do we collect this information for the tagging, or the music encyclopedia aspect of the database?! > No the downside is that the information wouldn't be available > at all for tagging if it's in an annotation. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
