i gave this a go - http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ProducerRelationshipType

1) thoughts? 2) consensus? 3) implementation? 4) ....? 5) profit? :)

On 25/03/06, Chris Bransden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. Additional Production != Co-Producer
>
> I agree that Co and Executive would be better as attributes than
> seperate relationships. Not sure how that's represented through AR
> though. Any similar working examples for other relationships so I can
> have a go at getting it all in the wiki?
>
> Chris
>
> On 25/03/06, Cristov Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Don Redman wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:30:45 +0100, Chris Bransden wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Co-ProducerRelationshipType
> > > >> http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1173
> > > >>
> > > >> not sure what else i have to do, so let me know :) think it's a
> > > >> relatively straightforward add.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Well, what about this one?
> > > >
> > > > Wolfsong seemed to disagree on this one (see his comment on
> > > the wiki).
> > > >
> > > > any comments anyone? Do we need this? Could this not be
> > > done with an
> > > > attribute like in:
> > > > artist {co-}produced album or track
> > > >
> > > >   DonRedman
> > > >
> > > This could be done by checking the "additional" marker.
> > >
> > > Example: "Ralf Hildenbeutel"[1] additionally produced
> > > "Accident in Paradise" [2]
> > >
> > > Schika
> > >
> > > [1] http://musicbrainz.org/showartist.html?artistid=8062
> > > [2] http://musicbrainz.org/showalbum.html?albumid=436618
> >
> > That I disagree with. Coproduction implies that people worked together while
> > additional production implies that someone added to but did not collaborate
> > with the original production. This happens frequently on remixes and
> > occasionally where a producer is fired but they use his original work
> > instead of starting over or they want to avoid a legal spat.
> >
> > I think the (co-) and (executive) attributes would be better.
> >
> > Cristov (wolfsong)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> >
>

_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to