I like it, works great. How hard would it be to get “Alternate” or whatever listed in release type so we could also move these alternates into a separate group in the artist discog list?
And I agree with Gecks that that disclamier might be a little more than is needed; hopefully people realize that as a transl(iter)ation it should be identical to the other release just with different words in the tracks and title. My test - http://test.musicbrainz.org/show/release/?releaseid=514127 Gecks wrote: > > On 10/08/06, Alexander Dupuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This >> relationship should only be used when the number and order of tracks on >> the >> two albums are identical, and each of the titles corresponds in meaning. > > IMO, like a similar disclaimer in the 'mastered by' relationship, this > isn't really neccesary. it's useful to see that album a is a > remaster/translation of album b, even if the content is slightly > different (as they often are with seperate releases - bonus tracks, > etc). unless there's a compelling reason i've missed, of course! i've > definitely seen people doing the remastered relationship between 2 > slightly different tracklistings and no one seems to care about it. > > i did an test relationship - > http://test.musicbrainz.org/show/release/relationships.html?releaseid=458471 > - all seems fine :) > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-mb-style--RFC%3A-Transliterations-translations%2C-again%21-%28now-on-test.musicbrainz.org%29-tf2084745s2885.html#a5753739 Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
