Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>
> Just cleaning out an RFC that never actually became an
> OfficialGuideline, we all follow StylePrinciple (
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/StylePrinciple ), and indeed, pretty much
> the entire "which guideline applies" structure depends on the steps it
> describes, but it never actually became a formal guideline.
>
> Any objections to this guideline / principle being formalized?
>
In the interests of cleaning up the half-finished business on MB's style
pages, I'm not going to veto this RFV.
However, I do find that ArtistIntent, StrongGuidelines,
ConsistentOriginalData, and StyleGuidelines are not as complete,
clearly-written, and consistent with the actual MB practice as I think they
should be. That makes the StylePrinciple not much help either. Vetoing this
RFV won't fix those problems, of course.
-----
-- http://jdlh.com/ Jim DeLaHunt , Vancouver, Canada •
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/JimDeLaHunt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/RFV%3A-StylePrinciple-tp15499310s2885p15518802.html
Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
