On Jul 10, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
>
> Of course it's obvious to anyone who sees how he dresses that Jim is
> hopelessly unqualified to be a "style leader".

And apparently you don't understand the concept of a private email  
either. ;-)

Seriously.. I think you understand the task at hand, and its a pretty  
daunting one. It seems that we haven't figured out the magic recipe  
for a distributed style mechanism. Why? Because its hard -- without a  
dedicated person putting in effort constantly you apparently can't do  
it. [0]

So, in May I spent a few lovely hours with Christoph König (aka Don  
Redman, our former style leader) and discussed the current state of  
affairs here and bantered back and forth on what should be done and  
how. This helped me define a set of requirements that I think are  
important for a new style process:

- The process should define a rough method for how a style issue gets  
turned from an idea into a concrete proposal that clearly outlines how  
the guidelines will change.  I don't think the process should define  
what tools get used to form a proposal, but I think it should clearly  
define the process of how a proposal is reviewed and accepted/ 
rejected. It would be good to outline a few example methods to create  
a proposal.

- Instead of working out complex proposals on this mailing list, we  
should encourage like-minded people to form ad-hoc groups on a  
particular style issue. These ad-hoc groups should collect input from  
the community at large and then go about solving a particular issue.  
It might very well be useful to the group to carry out this initial  
phase in private. This would keep a lid on the communication in the  
early stages of a proposal. Once the group finishes a proposal, the  
proposal should come into the view of the public and be reviewed by  
everyone who cares to look at it.

- Panda discussed creating templates that might give some structure to  
style proposals. This might give some much needed structure to the  
overfall process: to create a proposal, use an existing template and  
fill it out completely. Concrete steps to follow. If the issue doesn't  
fit one of the available templates, find another way to express/propos  
the issue. Maybe create a new template while you're at it.

- Each proposal should probably include some very basic components. A  
motivation section that describes the issue at hand, an example case  
section and a clearly stated goal that the proposal is supposed to  
solve.

- No one person should be able to ham-string the process. No single  
user vetos. But there must be room for an orderly community revolt in  
case the process (nukes the fridge/jumps the shark/jumps off the rails).

- The style leader should work with myself and perhaps a handful of  
other people to define this new process. Then this process needs to be  
documented and set into motion. Initially there would be lots and lots  
of work to take care of the backlog of issues. Ideally though the  
style leader should only work when there is a deadlock in the  
community. Or endless arguing on a point -- the leader should assess  
the situation, make a decision and move the discussion on. The style  
leader should be a guide. A tie breaker. A consensus former. Apply  
lube as needed to keep the process running.

Oh, if you want to give a new name to our style process/council/ 
whatever, please do. Perhaps its time to bring back the term "Style  
Cabal". :) After-all, the Style Leader position is a benevolent  
dictator position.

Jim: I would love to hear what you think of my ideas and how you would  
tackle the task of defining a working style process!

>  I mean really, a fleece
> jacket in July.  He must live in Canada or something.

Oh canadia! [1]

[0] http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/02/the_bottom_is_n.php
[1] http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/267098825/

--

--ruaok      Somewhere in Texas a village is *still* missing its idiot.

Robert Kaye     --     [EMAIL PROTECTED]     --    http://mayhem-chaos.net



_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to