On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Sami Sundell <ssund...@iki.fi> wrote:
> > On 16.6.2009, at 6.44, Brian Schweitzer wrote: > > > Some agreement: > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org/msg04837.html > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org/msg04842.html > > That's not agreement, that's two people talking on a mailing list. > > > If this is not the current working case, and people are still > > merging box set discs away, or renaming/merging non-box set discs > > into box set releases, then the problem which specifically had led > > to that whole discussion is back. > > > As Chris said, the guideline was never changed. I'm reasonably sure > not all people follow the style list, nor do they think a couple of > comments revert the official style guide. > > Personally, even though I get style list, I pass pretty much > everything that says "CSG" in the title, because nothing good will > ever come out of those :P So that was the first time I saw the > discussion. I bet I'm not the only one. > > People may ignore the CSG posts, but hopefully the entire discussion about that RFC - and the discussion here, and in IRC, in which there was agreement to - for the moment, until NGS - let them both coexist... let's hope that isn't being ignored. Otherwise, speaking as just one person who has worked hard to enter large box sets, I would be rather upset, were I to find that someone were merging / renaming box sets away again, just because disc 37 of some box happened to also have been separately released at some other point in time. Brian
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
