But the packaging does include the word "bonus disc". Kuno Woudt schreef: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:36:30AM -0700, jacobbrett wrote: > >> Potentially confusing, yes (if the discs didn't have their own titles), but >> more correct as they *are* bonus discs and not part of the actual album per >> say. >> > > But they ARE part of the actual album. This edition of it anyway. > (actually two editions from the looks of it, a 3CD one and a 3CD+1DVD > edition). > > The packaging uses disc 1, disc 2 and disc 3. If I have this edition of the > album, I definitely want the metadata in my files to match with it. > > Similarly, if the packaging doesn't use the word 'bonus' anywhere, I see no > reason to include it in the title in musicbrainz. > > Keep in mind that DiscNumberStyle is not a StrongGuideline. So, according > to the StylePrinciple we should stick with the 'disc 2' / 'disc 3' > designation > without 'bonus'. As that is what is how they are labeled "on official > sources". > > -- kuno / warp. > > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > >
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
