On Jun 28, 2010, at 17:08, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > 2010/6/28 Andrew Conkling <andrew.conkl...@gmail.com> > On Jun 28, 2010, at 4:14, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > > You were looking for more general formulations. I suggest: > > - X is the author of the cadenza for track # > > - track # contains a cadenza whose author is X > > > > ... a little too "verbose", maybe? > > I'd say. I'd think "composed" would be good, perhaps "wrote", or some other > synonym; at least those suggestions there don't seem any better than > "composed" or "wrote". > > Any further thoughts? Procedural advice? :) > > I was precisely trying to avoid "write" because as your proposal explained, > sometimes cadenza's are not written at first. I am confused because you now > seem to be going precisely towards what you suggested you were trying to > avoid. But anyhow this is quite minor, the text is quite clear and I would be > very surprised if there was a voting war because of this.
It was three years ago. :) I would prefer "composed", but agree that the word choice is pretty minor.
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
