2010/6/29 Andrew Conkling <andrew.conkl...@gmail.com> > On Jun 28, 2010, at 17:08, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > > 2010/6/28 Andrew Conkling <andrew.conkl...@gmail.com> > >> On Jun 28, 2010, at 4:14, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: >> > You were looking for more general formulations. I suggest: >> > - X is the author of the cadenza for track # >> > - track # contains a cadenza whose author is X >> > >> > ... a little too "verbose", maybe? >> >> I'd say. I'd think "composed" would be good, perhaps "wrote", or some >> other synonym; at least those suggestions there don't seem any better than >> "composed" or "wrote". >> >> Any further thoughts? Procedural advice? :) >> > > I was precisely trying to avoid "write" because as your proposal explained, > sometimes cadenza's are not written at first. I am confused because you now > seem to be going precisely towards what you suggested you were trying to > avoid. But anyhow this is quite minor, the text is quite clear and I would > be very surprised if there was a voting war because of this. > > > It was three years ago. :) I would prefer "composed", but agree that the > word choice is pretty minor. >
Right. And I answered 3 years ago too :-) You still have my: +1 -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
