Another thing that I just thought of and mentioned to Paul on IRC is which artists do we link work edits to, without artist credits?
I'm not sure exactly what's possible... I'll bring it up during today's dev chat. Nikki Paul C. Bryan wrote: > Here is a summary of the response to round 2: > > Generally, there is a strong consensus for the "all of the above" > approach, meaning that both work writer ARs, recording performer ARs, > and comments should be used to clarify/disambiguate works in listings. > > In terms of AR display order preference in listings, there is clear > consensus that writer ARs definitely come first, performer ARs second. > Where performer ARs may be too numerous, an abbreviated listing is > supported. > > For abbreviated listings of performers, the consensus on which performer > ARs to list is to list the "most popular". There is no clear consensus > on what this yet means. > > > With this input, I propose the following: > > 1. The works tab for an artist should display all works that the artist > has direct (i.e. writer) and indirect (i.e. performance via recording) > ARs with. > > 2. A works search listing should display the work name, writer ARs, and > an abbreviated listing of performer ARs. I suggest the following format: > > Score Name Writer(s) Performer(s) > ----- ---- --------- ------------ > 100 Title Writer 1 Performer 1 > Writer 2 > > 100 Title Writer 3 Performer 2 > Comment Performer 3 > Performer 4 > > 3. Abbreviated performer listings display the top 5 performer ARs of > recordings of the work. > > Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
