Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > > Really good point, and terrible wording there. Would this work? "The > titles on a white label vinyl release should never be assumed to be > untitled without more information, and should be entered as [unknown]. > As indicated, if any of the tracks is released in an official way, the > name (or lack of it) in the official release should extend to the > white label release." Well, I wouldn't say "terrible wording" over such a minor bit of ambiguity.
But, yeah, the new wording is better. It also clears up something that I didn't even notice in the old version. It's possible to interpret "... is released... and gets a name" to mean that only _later_ official releases can give names to whitelabels, which is clearly not the intention. But you'd have to be really perverse to interpret the new version that way. -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz-mailing-lists.2986109.n2.nabble.com/RFC-317-Untitled-Track-Style-update-tp5960090p5965322.html Sent from the Style discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
