Christopher Key wrote: > On 06/06/2011 19:05, Alex Mauer wrote: >> On 06/04/2011 07:36 PM, Simon Reinhardt wrote: >>> One last point: What are we going to do about ordering of the parts? You >>> can't do it with the relationship so should the titles of the part works >>> have numbers in them? >> I can’t think of any reason that the part ordering is important. >> Tracklists provide the ordering where it is relevant, do they not? >> > See [2]. I think that if work relationships are to replace the contents > of that annotation, some means of ordering would be very important. > > My understanding of Simon's comment is that it isn't possible to add one > or more attributes to the relationship that can be used to sort the > list; Simon, is this correct? I've always wondered about the utility of > a sort field for entities other than Artists. With suitable guidelines, > these could be populated such that a strict alpha ordering would sort > entities in their natural order, and might deal with this situation.
Well, it's not possible at the moment but I guess it could be made possible. :-) In the meantime we can decide whether we want to enforce a naming scheme on the parts to make them sort in the right order using alphabetical order or whether we just live with the parts not being sorted correctly. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
