> On 18/07/11 12:07, SwissChris wrote:
>> When cover says "Track (feat. Artist)" should this ("follow the cover")
>> translate into
>> "Track (feat. artist)" (on track field) [by] "Main Artist" (on AC field)
>> or (as I think is the only reasonable way) as
>> "Track" (on track field) [by] "Main Artist feat. featured artist" (on AC
>> field).if we don't want ws/1 compatibility i would favour to move "feat." also on tracklvl to the artist credits, away from the title field. Am 18.07.2011, 12:31 Uhr, schrieb Kuno Woudt <k...@frob.nl>: > Here are two examples (warning, large images :). > > Track 14 on Mysteryland 2010 is listed on the cover as: > > track title: Born Again > artist credits: RICKY L FEAT. M:CK > > http://www.frob.nl/mb/2011/mysteryland.black.2010.jpg > > > Track 1 on BoA is listed on the cover as: > > track title: I Did It For Love (featuring Sean Garret) > artist credits: BoA > > http://www.frob.nl/mb/2011/smusa01.jpg these are some nice examples! 1. compilation where the artist is credited on every track, and if there is a feat. artist it's next to the main artist. 2. a single artist cd, where there is no column for the artist (because of obvious reasons). however the feat. artist can't be appended to the artist here so it is written in parenthesis AND with smaller fontsize thus making it clearly separated from the track title. so beside that i think that we should credit/link featured artists properly also on track-lvl i do think that in most of these cases the feat. should not be part of the tracktitle in most occasions. if the feat. artist is not in parentheses and written in the same size/style as the rest of the track i would keep it in the tracktitle. -- lorenz pressler PGP 0x92E9551A _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
