On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 07:55, symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> wrote: > I recall no one had any ideas of what to do with track artists. I'm going to > suggest that we leave them at the default value (=release artist). > > Slightly reworded from the 2011 wiki: > > Artist Credits > > Recording Artist Credits should link to the performer, not the composer. > Composer information should be included in a linked work (by way of the > recording-work performance AR).
I'm a little confused by what we're after in this thread. The title says "recording credits" and "track artist", but your post seems to focus on track ACs. Then you seem to say that we should use the same ACs as the release. Then you go on to say performers, not composer (which I think you may have revised in a later post, I'm not real clear on that). In any case, can someone please explain the benefits of including performers in track/recording ACs? I have some general ideas, but I'd like to hear why people feel so strongly about this. -- -:-:- David K. Gasaway -:-:- Email: d...@gasaway.org _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
