On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 15:35, Rupert Swarbrick <rswarbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > jesus2099 & Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > ... lots. > > Guys, you have been discussing this for quite some time, frantically > scoring points against each other and arguing that the other is not > following a reputed source. You then both agreed that you should get > input from a style leader. > > Nikki basically pointed out that this really doesn't matter to > MusicBrainz: there are very few releases where the question makes any > difference, and these have been de facto standardised. > > As such, your continuing discussion in this forum is off topic, as well > as bitter and unpleasant. Maybe it's time to agree to disagree?
Thank you for interrupting us. While this is the appropriate forum for RFC/RFV of style guidelines, I do apologize for the state of discourse. I have tried very hard to stay on topic and not do point-by-point replies for every detail I disagree with, but have not always succeeded. I believe that the references and "studies" I have documented will stand up to scrutiny by third parties and that the conclusion is clear. The RFV has gotten its V, so I will not reply further unless explicitly asked to do so by one of our style leaders. -- Philip Jägenstedt _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
