On 12-03-26 03:17 PM, Alex Mauer wrote: > On 03/26/2012 01:50 PM, Sheamus Patt wrote: >> I've agree - the current definition is not at all what I think of as a >> medley. Here's the guideline, from >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Medley_Relationship_Type. >> >> This indicates that a track is a compilation of several other >> tracks. This applies to one long recording that contains multiple >> songs, one after the other, in which the audio material of the >> original tracks has not been altered. >> >> Shouldn't our 'medley' definition cover this other type of recording, >> where the different works are brought together when the recording is >> laid down and not later as an editing process? > You may want to look at the proposal this thread is about, > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Hawke/Proposal/Performance-medley
Sorry, I should have looked at the whole thread. Your proposal fixes my issues with the old definition though - thanks. I've also come across situations where I thought 'medley' was appropriate, but also wanted to include an attribute, and you've addressed that need. +1 > > It proposes updating (replacing) that relationship type entirely. Here > is the text: > > “medley: This indicates that a recording includes multiple works > performed as a single continuous piece.” > > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
