+1

I suggest to have more than one sparse sentence in MB doc pages with
polished wording that only those who follow style guidelines forum can
understand. Normal users will only benefit if we can clearly see what to do
when artist is credited as conductor, as chorus master, when both roles are
credited on release. Samples for each case would be nice, too. And in this
particular case this detailed information also should appear on "conductor"
help page, too.


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <
reosare...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Salutaurs in http://forums.musicbrainz.org/viewtopic.php?pid=21512 just
> pointed out that the current conductor page says chorus master should be
> used for choral conductors:
> http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Conductor_Relationship_Type
>
> That's just wrong I'd say - many choirs have both positions, and many
> releases have a credit for the conductor and a credit for the choir master.
>
> So I'm proposing to change that line to "Chorus Master Relationship Type
> should be used for chorus master credits." (other option would be to just
> remove that line).
>
> I'm not sure whether "Conductor Relationship Type should be used to
> indicate the conductor of an orchestra or band." on
> http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Chorus_Master_Relationship_Type should be
> changed too to something like "Conductor Relationship Type should be used
> to indicate the conductor for the recording" ... opinions?
>
>
> Wiki page is at
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Conductor_Relationship_Type
> Ticket is at http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-205
> Expected RFV date is Apr 11
>
> --
> Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to