Tom Crocker wrote > Thanks for that. Perhaps that is an example that would further clarify the > new position.
Perhaps this guideline could do with an examples section, where a few versions of some tracks are taken and the process of deciding which recordings to use is explained? I tried to do something similar in the last revision of the recordings guideline, but I couldn't think of a simple way to do it. Let me know if you think this is a good idea/have any example tracks which would be good to see. Tom Crocker wrote > I like the idea of mix and master entities, to link up basically the same > audio but still differentiate the mastering where needed. > Just to throw in another corner case to see where it fits in the new > plans: > a 'stream' (in case we needed more terms) of audio that's been cut into > different sized tracks as part of the remastering process. Should this be > a > big mix (at say album level) with mix parts for the tracks? I know this > isn't solved already but good to think about it. We won't be having Master entities for a while, if at all - I think it was decided in the meetings that we would see whether they were needed after this revision of recordings was completed. For that example, we would need to make a recording for each track, since there's no way of saying that a track has the "partial" audio of a recording. It would be good if there was a "has part" relationship type for recordings, like we have for works, but that hasn't been proposed yet. Tom Crocker wrote > re: the guidance > This may not be the place but I'd like to see more specific advice on what > the title of a recording (and track, work and release) should be. Their > content should all be normalised under the general title style guidance > but > what should their content be... I'll be doing a separate proposal for that when this is passed. I did try to include it in this proposal, but it's better to focus on one major change at a time! :) -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-208-New-Recordings-Guidelines-tp4651054p4651143.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
