Oh well. I obviously don't understand how people are planning to use it!
On 6 May 2013 11:26, symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> wrote: > The problem is, we can never source anything of that. It's unlikely that > you could find proof for even the exception I mentioned. > In most cases, there will be a mastering engineer credit, and that's it. > There's no point in trying to construct a system where we could input data > that isn't available. > > > 2013/5/6 Tom Crocker <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com> > >> I agree for basic master and remaster. The point I was making (but >> probably shouldn't - it doesn't need discussing here) is you've got >> different degrees of mastering - the same master at one level but slightly >> different loudness between releases A and B vs C and D. Or with a >> compilation, say they've taken the remaster, but would have usually >> levelled volume and adjusted silence, maybe even adding a fade to a track >> that segued from one to another. >> So I think it's a tougher line to draw, and we're struggling enough with >> this! >> On May 6, 2013 10:11 AM, "symphonick" <symphon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> In the same way that a remix is made from source audio and not any >>> previous mix, a remaster will usually be based on a specific mix, and not >>> on any previous master. I'm sure there are exceptions, where you take >>> previously mastered tracks and add new mastering on top of that; but this >>> is something that you must be able to source before entering that >>> relationship in MB, since it will lead to totally different relationships: >>> Mix A -> Master B -> Tracks a-f >>> Mix A -> Remaster C -> Tracks g-l >>> Possible exception: Mix A -> Master B -> Track b -> Remaster D -> Track n >>> >>> >>> >>> 2013/5/5 Tom Crocker <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> Although which level of master should be employed will be an >>>> interesting debate if/when that begins >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5 May 2013 19:50, LordSputnik <ben.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's an very specific case - I wouldn't add mastering information to >>>>> such a >>>>> release, and wouldn't expect others to until there's a better >>>>> solution. It's >>>>> likely that there will be a master entity at some point, or a better >>>>> way of >>>>> using tracks between releases. >>>>> >>>>> However, this guideline has already passed, so any new mastering >>>>> information >>>>> being added should be at the release level as soon as it becomes the >>>>> official guideline. The recording remaster relationship type is >>>>> effectively >>>>> already deprecated. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-208-New-Recordings-Guidelines-tp4651054p4652499.html >>>>> Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >>>>> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >>>>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >>>> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >>>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> /symphonick >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >>> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> > > > > -- > > /symphonick > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
