On 13 April 2013 00:09, lixobix <arjtap...@aol.com> wrote: > Tom Crocker wrote > > My point is that neither the definition of a mix or an edit needs to be > > exclusive because we're defining recordings. Your general definition of > an > > edit was excellent, it just didn't need to be added to by way of > excluding > > mixes, because all that matters is that an edit or a mix (or something in > > the middle that someone could choose to call either an edit or a mix) = > > new > > recording > > "A recording is a mix or an edit" sounds good. I presume the definition on > the wiki will be changed as well. > > I hope so. It's just LordSputnik said:
> > -- > View this message in context: > http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-208-New-Recordings-Guidelines-tp4651054p4651458.html > Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
