2013/4/16 Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com> > 2013/4/16 lixobix <arjtap...@aol.com> > >> Frederic Da Vitoria wrote >> > ...if a recording is released then edited and this edit is it self >> > released, the edited recording would be >> > considered as the same as the first... >> >> The definition clearly states these would be two recordings. The first one >> (A) is "A recording is a captured series of sounds". The second >> "incorporates existing recordings" (A), and is "the product of ... >> editing". >> > > I was referring to symphonick's last 2 suggestions, which were included in > my message before you edited it :-) > > > "In MusicBrainz, a *Recording* is either the result of *mixing* and/or * > editing* one or more *audio tracks*, or a released unedited recording." > > Or maybe ""In MusicBrainz, a *Recording* is a released *audio track*, > either mixed/edited or unprocessed. See below for specific cases." > > > Frederic Da Vitoria wrote >> > a Recording is always released >> >> Under the current definition, I'm not sure this is true. What about >> standalone recordings? Personally, I think anything accessible to the >> public >> in some form should be considered released. >> > > This should definitely be clarified. I don't have an opinion for or > against it, but I think it should be clearly stated. > > Yeah, "released" as in "made accessible to the public" was what I had in mind.
/symphonick
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
