On 18 April 2013 20:49, lixobix <arjtap...@aol.com> wrote:

> Tom Crocker wrote
> > Currently MB Recordings are often used for any and all captured sounds,
> > rather than
> > those sufficiently different (which we seemed to agree were those
> modified
> > by editing or mixing, but not by mastering).
>
> Is this really a significant problem? I've not come across users adding
> recordings for 'any and all captured sounds'. Could someone give some
> examples?
>
> As I see it, mixing, editing, and mastering are the contentious areas. We
> seem to be agreed that different mixing and editing results in different
> recordings, but not different mastering. This is reflected in my
> definition,
> as there is no mention of mastering, therefore mastering is not a factor in
> determining what a recording is, or distinguishing one from another.
> Mastering does not involve mixing of editing a recording.
>

I agree, that's the contentious area. Particularly the mastering. What I
don't really get is how your definition rules out mastering. I know it
mentions other things but it sounds like it has already included mastering
in the first bit.


>


> Tom Crocker wrote
> > "A *recording* is a captured series of musical, vocal or other sounds but
> > is not associated with the volume, tone, pitch, compression or medium
> with
> > which it may be released."
>
> My point is that the only recordings that are added at the moment which we
> are intending to exclude are remasters. So long as mastering is excluded
> from the definition, that will be sufficient. This one is confusing as it
> says a recording is not associated with volume, tone, pitch, or
> compression;
> all of which may be involved in a recording.
>

I realised that, what about the second one?



>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-208-New-Recordings-Guidelines-tp4651054p4651732.html
> Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to