Frederic Da Vitoria wrote > What about this: > > For this definition*, editing *involves adding, removing, lengthening, > shortening or re-arranging audio track. We thus restrict the definition > only for the purposes of this recordings definition. The edit relationship > uses a wider definition. > > This may be me again not knowing English spelling rules, but shouldn't > "audio track" be "audio tracks"?
I don't think we really need to consider the edit relationship type here. Our edit definition should be broad enough to cover radio edits too. I think if we use Tom's definition from a few days ago, and add "substituting" somewhere, we'd cover everything, including censorship: "Editing is defined as adding, removing, lengthening, shortening, substituting or otherwise re-arranging sections of audio track." (And yeah, "sections of audio track" is fine) -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-208-New-Recordings-Guidelines-tp4651054p4652349.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
