2013/8/14 Tom Crocker <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com> > > > > On 13 August 2013 22:07, symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> AFAIK "artist intent" pre-dates NGS (there were only tracks). Maybe >> something for the documentation review team to look into? >> It would be weird if you could completely replace the title, but not >> variations in spelling... >> > > Oh, okay. You'll have to forgive my post-NGS only naivety. The way I was > guessing it would have been reasonable would be the 'you have to prove it > was *intended *by the artist to be that way' rather than that it just > happens to be, but that's probably a nonsense! Feel free to ignore > > That's how I would see it too?
/symphonick
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
