On 2009/03/17 14:20, Mario Lenz <m...@riolenz.de> wrote:
> Jochen Keil wrote:
> 
> > So i'd say let's got for the cuesheet option as it is at least
> > "defined" (though there is no real standard too).
> 
> So a non- standard solution involving a complex task like developing a
> cuesheet parser is superior to another non- standard solution that
> simply changes a handfull of lines in your code?

Yes, definitely.  Only standards guarantee good interoperability.  And
I'm not talking about interoperability with software which doesn't
follow the standard.  I don't care much about that.

> Anyway: My changes shouldn't break anything

That's important.  Until we have full cuesheet support, I don't object
having a hack (which is supported by at least one other major media
player).

Mario, your patch is useful for some people, this is why I merged it.
But since it's non-standard, we may decide to remove it at any time,
when we have a better solution.

Max

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Musicpd-dev-team mailing list
Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team

Reply via email to