Hi Jan, Jan Krüger wrote: > I feel obligated to point out the implications of that. It's probably > (remember that I'm not a lawyer) legal to license your own parts of the > code under the BSD license (but only for parts that are not based on > the original code at all), but the overall project, i.e. libcue in this > case, still needs to be licensed under the GPL to conform to section 2b > of the GPLv2[1]. So Jochen would effectively be dual-licensing those > parts of the code he wrote himself, but that's of limited use as long > as the whole of libcue needs to be GPL'd.
At least someone could take my lines in BSD freedom. ;) About libcue as a whole being under GPL: i hope this point is now clear enough in the latest COPYING file i commited. Jochen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________ Musicpd-dev-team mailing list Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team
