On 2013/11/24 14:08, Denis Krjuchkov <de...@crazydev.net> wrote: > 24.11.2013 18:38, Max Kellermann ??????????: > >I was wondering whether we should use boost for that. Now you > >implemented a new parser. Why that? > > > > Why not? Probably for the complex cases it's better to use a > library* but MPD currently uses very simple flag options that are > easily parsed without any library. If you intention was to add many > other command line options in the future this probably is not the > way to go. On the other side if the goal is to remove GLib this > looks fairly suitable.
Sound fair. I've merged it, thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Musicpd-dev-team mailing list Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team
