Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > given the small size of the active development team.
And it's likely to stay that way if the community doesn't encourage new people. I'm not surprised my ideas attracted a host of 'no' emails, but I was hoping someone would suggest a way forward. > reviewing large-scale changes is an additional burden we can probably > do without right now You can't avoid that burden (assuming that the code will one day be cleaned up). You can only postpone it. Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > there won't ever be a right time. either you accept that legible code is > worth it, or you don't. Given the timescale of mutt (4 releases in 5 years), I can't imagine when the 'right time' may be.
