Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is safer for incoming mailboxes. But for archive boxes, that are > accessed from only one machine, it is useless. So, could the locking > mechanism be chosen from the .muttrc? If the mailbox is only accessed from one machine, why is it on an NFS server? Just put the mailbox on the one machine that is going to access it. No more NFS slow-down. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer | PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
- Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0 (was Re: [Ann... Eric Boehm
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0 (was... David DeSimone
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0 ... Eric Boehm
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt ... Brendan Cully
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than m... Eric Boehm
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower t... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower t... Lars Hecking
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt ... David DeSimone
- File locking (was: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: File locking (was: Mutt 1.1.9 ... David DeSimone
- Re: File locking (was: Mutt 1.... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0 (was... Lars Hecking
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0 (was... Clint Olsen
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE! David T-G
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE! David T-G
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDAT... Byrial Jensen
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDAT... Hans Bogaards
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDAT... Stefan `Sec` Zehl
- My patches are updated to Mutt 1.2 Byrial Jensen