Bennett Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So in that case, I suppose the original question could be answered
> really sadistically, with "compose the message, then postpone it, then
> change to the postponed folder, then select the message, then
> repeatedly bounce it by hand to each of the recipients". Love those
> nice user-friendly solutions:-).
Actually, Mutt is in a unique position here, to be able to specify
sender addresses to sendmail without putting those names into the
headers. That is, Mutt could easily feed sendmail a message with a
"To: undisclosed-recipients:;" header, and then give sendmail a command
line such as "sendmail -(options) user1@host1 user2@host2 ...". So,
sendmail would have the correct envelope addresses, but they would not
appear in the message.
But there is no code to do this in Mutt currently.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
UX WTEC Engineer | PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
