On Thu Mar 16 2000 at 12:39:25PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
>
> Actually, Mutt is in a unique position here, to be able to specify
> sender addresses to sendmail without putting those names into the
> headers. That is, Mutt could easily feed sendmail a message with a
> "To: undisclosed-recipients:;" header, and then give sendmail a command
Actually, I'd like to be enlighted on this: when I compose from within
mutt, and set the To: field to something like this, here is what I get:
( I included all headers, I was Bcced)
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 29 15:48:44 2000
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from x-mailer.polytechnique.fr (x-mailer.polytechnique.fr
[129.104.35.1])
by daphne.math.polytechnique.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP
id PAA04666
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000
15:48:43 +0200
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129])
by x-mailer.polytechnique.fr (x.y.z/x.y.z) with ESMTP id
PAA15453
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:47:39
+0100 (WET DST)
Received: from zebu.ann.jussieu.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[134.157.2.58])
by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.10.0/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id
e2TDmhU89168
; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:48:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by zebu.ann.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 666)
id 799856078; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:00:18 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:00:18 +0200
From: Fabrice Planchon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "test du rewriting": ;"test du rewriting":;;"test du
rewriting":;@jussieu.fr;;;;
Subject: test
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.1i
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, how comes the To hearder is expanded like this, and who is doing
this ? mutt or the MTA ? (actually, sending the same e-mmail locally
would produce just
To: "test du rewriting": ;"test du rewriting":;;
so the odds are the MTA has to do with it...)
F.
