David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 24 May 2000:
> This tongue-in-cheek comment is actually not a bad idea:  Do not
> hard-code any of the keybindings in the Mutt source, but instead set the
> defaults in the system Muttrc.  This way, it is possible for a site to
> implement their preferred keybinding policies, without having to
> "un-Elm-ify" Mutt every time you want to get proper generic bindings.

That's good as an option, but then the problem would be that you can't
have an independent stand-alone binary that works even with no resource
files...  It would be useless (without a .muttrc), you couldn't even add
your own commands inside it because : wouldn't have been defined. :-)


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
I don't want the whole world, I just want your half.

Reply via email to