Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's good as an option, but then the problem would be that you can't
> have an independent stand-alone binary that works even with no
> resource files...
Is this really one of the design goals of Mutt? I don't see a problem
with getting people used to the idea that there must be a system-Muttrc,
and it should be copied wherever Mutt gets copied. That way, if a site
has policies like domain-names and hidden-hosts, they won't get lost
just because someone copies the Mutt binary somewhere else. Perhaps
Mutt should simply fail to start without some sort of configuration
input. :)
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
Richardson IT | PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
