On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:21:30AM -0400, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
> Note that I have found, from recent discussion, that gkrellm (and perhaps
> other new mail programs) improperly handle new and old-but-unread messages
> (which many folks might consider new, though mutt correctly doesn't,
> but which may fit within the design spec of gkrellm's "counting unread
> messages" purpose) in Maildirs.
I still say mutt is wrong - 'unread' is synonymous with 'new' :)
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"Where would man be today if it wasn't for women? In the
Garden of Eden eating watermelon and taking it easy."
-- C Kennedy
PGP signature
