Cleber, et al -- ...and then Cleber S. Mori said... % % On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 11:11:10PM +0100, Nils Holland wrote: % > Hi folks,
Welcome to mutt, Nils! :-) I was fortunate enough to have elm in place (after all, PINE Is Not Elm) and to never be subjected to PINE. My transition to mutt was seamless :-) % > ... % > now I'm hooked! % ... % % Indeed, I think we all think so. % % Like you, I came from pine, just a month ago, and I love it!. % % Mutt have just one "problem". It is slow to open folders, because it does % not cache them. Pine did it, and it feels much more fast. I thought I might address this... A cached folders discussion has just come up, and there are reasons that such behavior is both good and bad, but who knows if a patch may come out. At any rate, though, mutt works with lots of different types of folders. If your folders are big and you want them to stay that way (instead of moving much of your old stuff off to an archive folder -- which might be compressed, too), you might play with changing formats to see if any open faster than others. Just make a copy of your original folder (in whatever format it is) to go seamlessly back if you don't like the change; we've just had a report that some of the headers can get mucked up by going back and forth and back again. % % I don't know if there is a option for that, but I believe not. See the note above :-) HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg21301/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
