* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 20:51]: > Nick Wilson wrote: > > > Actually, two attachments one of which is the pgp sig. What would > > cause my emails to be sent as attachments rather than inline(if that's > > the right term)? > > this is mutt's default behavior. you can do: > pgp_create_traditional > > but this still sends it as 'application/pgp-signature' (or something > like that) so you will need the pgp_outlook_compat patch if you want to > send a plaintext, clearsigned attachment (or else pgp sign a text file > and then attach that or something). > > better yet... don't pgp sign mails to people unless you specifically > know that they can deal with it. > > presumably your mum knows you well enough that she'll notice something's > up if some evil h4x0r takes over your email without having to check your > pgp signature.
Sorry, my post was unclear. I'm not really worried about the sig. It's the fact that the body of the mail (like this text) was received as an attatchment that she had to open. That can't be right sure? -- Nick Wilson Tel: +45 3325 0688 Fax: +45 3325 0677 Web: www.explodingnet.com
msg22505/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
