Peter -- ...and then Peter T. Abplanalp said... % % On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:50:25PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: % > Peter T. Abplanalp wrote: ... % > > that neither of these formats appears to work if the recipient is % > > using outlook. btw - the outlook is set up to use the g-data ... % > % > so basically, you would need to run either 1.2.5 or 1.3.x with the
Either Shane Wegener's $p_o_c patch or Dale Wooledge's pgp-traditional patch, as I understand it, though I have not yet run the full gamut of tests under 1.3.28 to know for sure. I'm almost certain that Dale's patch let's you just set $pgp_create_traditional and not have to worry about $p_o_c and yet still talk with LookOut! successfully. % > pgp_outlook_compat patch (i think there's a version for 1.2.5, which it BTW, since you are running 1.2.5 you ought to upgrade to 1.2.5.1, sans security hole, and so you might as well go to 1.3.28 anyway. % > looks like you're running currently), or the cvs version, which (as you % > can see) can create a traditional message in a way that will be read by % > MUAs other than mutt. % % excellent, thanks for the help! i'll look around for the patch, % mutt.org i'm thinking. Actually, probably not; I haven't looked there recently to see what patch contributors are listed, but Shane's and Dale's patches are pure feature and aren't part of the official mutt package. You can search through the archives for sw.pgp_outlook_compat and/or dw.pgp-traditional, since they were both posted to mutt-users, or you can surf over to http://mutt.justpickone.org/ and look in the cocktail directory for Dale's and further under the Old directory for Shane's. While you're there, you can check my 00-Sources file and probably find each of their URLs. % % if i have an email to which i add an attachement and then choose the % encrypt and sign options with pgp_create_traditional, will the A final possibility is a macro in the compose menu to manually sign and/or encrypt the message before you send it. You can find some discussion on the subject with serach terms like "pgp + macro + davidtg" because I remember taking part in a few of them. The idea lives on as the only alternative for some because ... % attachement be encrypted as well or must i encrypt and sign it by % itself? my guess is the latter as that appears to be why people are % now moving (flame material, i know) towards the pgp/mime method. ... that's my understanding as well. $p_c_t will only work if you have no attachments and use us-ascii characters, or at least that's the way it's been through 1.3.x so far. % % -- % Peter Abplanalp % % Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] % PGP: pgp.mit.edu HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg26709/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
