begin quoting what Peter T. Abplanalp said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:49:15PM -0700: > that this would be considered "broken" by today's "standards." i > guess if i want mutt to handle things the same way for those of my > recipients who have to use outlook, i'm going to have to "fix" mutt or > has anyone already done this?
Yes. There's a patch, and it's already in the latest CVS versions. See the archives; it's been discussed several times in the last week, and at least once today.
msg26732/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
