Dan, et al -- ...and then Dan Boger said... % % On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:10:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote: % > Same here, and I'm only on mbox :-) I'd probably use IMAP more except % > for the bit where I can't go back and mark a message 'N'ew again :-( % % why not? works for me... The only time I wished for a trash box was
Why not live without the 'N'ew flag? Because I want it, of course. Or am I missing your point? % when I notied a lot of times I delete a message without reading it (from % one of the lists), and notice that I actually did want to read it (while % it was syncing)... but for that, I just created a mail.today box, and a % mail.yesterday - that keeps all the mail I get in the past two days... % :) Not a bad idea. I use procmail's backup method and I keep the last 3k messages, or almost 5 days' worth at the current rate. % % -- % Dan Boger % [EMAIL PROTECTED] TIA & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg26919/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
