* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-16 08:32 (CEST)]

> While that sounds like a good idea in general, I don't think it's the
> real problem.  I get my mail delivered right here and I couldn't verify
> the sig on this message, Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> ironically enough.

Signed Mon 15 Apr 2002 22:58:13 CEST w DSA key ID 4065A1DA
Verified ok: Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Using:

This is fetchmail release 5.3.3+NTLM+SDPS+NLS
gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.1

Updating...

It does check with 1.0.6 also.
Time to upgrade fetchmail I think, as this seems quite old ;)

-- 
Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com
2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375
If the brain was so simple that we could understand it, we would
be so simple that we could not understand it (Lyall Watson)

Attachment: msg27268/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to