* Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-16-02 12:12]: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-16-02 11:32]: > > Hi, > > > > * Patrick [05/16/02 17:29:54 CEST] wrote: > > > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-16-02 09:04]: > > > > * David T-G [05/16/02 15:47:11 CEST] wrote: > > > > > If you just want to relay instead of send, well, that's probably tough;
> > > > But the point is that not all dial-up connections are in the > > common blacklists while lots of them are. If you feel > > confident, try to deliver an email directly to my university's > > account (in From: header). A few mails I receive are simply > > forwards of bounces containing the original mail which was > > rejected. > > Well, I'm not necessairly confident, but GAME. Does it work?? I'll > only know if it bounces back to me (which may not happen) or you reply. oops, ?? > > > AND, both my dial-up and cable providers had smtp accounts available > > > for sending mail. Why not set sendmail to use your provider's smtp > > > account?? > > > > I have to. Just because I'm too lazy to first try direct > > delivery and later via relay if I received a failure notice. > > I think that with SuSE direct delivery is the easiest. It did not > require any setup other than NOT setting mail to an smtp.xxxx.xxx host. > > ps. I use postfix, not sendmail. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org