* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-04 13:17]:
> It looks like that's the case for Ctl, anyway, and maybe for Shf.
> Given, thanks to my new friend Bob, the handy
>
> perl -lpe '$_ = join " ", unpack("c*", $_)'
>
> to take input per line and spit out key codes and then running
>
> echo "ctl-v f1" | ...
> echo "ctl-v shf-f1" | ...
> echo "ctl-v ctl-ft" | ...
>
> we get
>
> 27 79 80
> 27 91 50 51 126
> 27 79 80
>
> (where F1 and Ctl-F1 appear as '^[OP' and Shf-F1 is '^[[23~'), so
> there is no difference whatsoever between F1 and C-F1, while S-F1
> might be tricky to recognize because it's longer (and, in fact, the
> same as F11, as Kurt showed).
I get:
$ echo "ctrl-v f1" | perl -lpe '$_ = join " ", unpack("c*", $_)'
27 79 80
$ echo "ctrl-v ctrl-F1" | perl -lpe '$_ = join " ", unpack("c*", $_)'
27 79 53 80
I'm using a happy hacking keyboard, which might make a difference, but I
doubt it.
(darren)
--
People who are willing to give up freedom for the sake of short term
security, deserve neither freedom nor security.
-- Ben Franklin
