--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Derrick 'dman' Hudson spake thus: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 05:58:01AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > It's a crude, but effective, loop detection mechanism (mentioned in > RFC 821 as well). When the MTA sees what it thinks is an excessive > number of Received: headers it figures a mail loop has occured and > bounces the message instead. Wouldn't it be more effective to check the Received headers to see if it's gone through the same server twice, and /then/ bounce the mail? It's not a mail loop if it just has a lot of servers to go through. --=20 Rob 'Feztaa' Park http://members.shaw.ca/feztaa/ -- Today is the last day of your life so far. --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9M3RtPTh2iSBKeccRAlo6AJ4uxO4NQ6okJb2xKULPkOspAgsEkwCeOCXD 7yp0u8W1hcOFrgqtyXxxA9A= =qtH2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--
