On Oct 01 at 01:13, Sven Guckes spoke: > * Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 20:12]: > > are there alternative headers to Reply-To: > > and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs? > > "we could tell you - but then we'd have to kill you."
Why? It isn't a fight against Reply-To and Mail-Followup-To, is it? > of course there are more headers - and all of them > are probably only supported by this one mailer. > use whatever you like - but please do > not expect mutt to support any of these. I don't expect mutt to support them. I'm thinking to put them into a send-hook. I can't expect other people to use mutt, if they decide to answer me. I'm just wondering why some people don't honor Reply-To or Mail-Followup-To. Maybe they choose to ignore it. Or maybe their mailer is expecting another header therefore. -Hanspeter
