* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-03 09:19]: > The majority of ansers I get in deed come from mail clients that > do honor Reply-To. But occasionally I realize that I get answers > at the address that's not mentioned in the Reply-To header.
then the Reply-To is *not* honored. is this a mutt reply? no. > Now if the only reason Reply-To is not honored is the configuration > of the one's MUA that's answering me, I have to accept that. > But if there is _another reason_ for this and > I can do something about it, I'd just like to know... if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not* the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists. Sven
